|
The Nevada Legislature in 2003
passed legislation that, regardless of AYP
performance, requires improvement plans be
developed/revised and implemented annually by
schools, school districts, and the state (through
its State Board of Education).
The culture behind Nevada’s
improvement planning embraces high expectations for
each student and is built upon the foundation of the
following beliefs:
- The work of schools is
student learning.
- All children can benefit from
challenging and relevant curriculum.
- Every teacher can be an
expert when provided collaborative and sustained
professional development focused on improving
instruction.
- Content should be aligned to
standards, be challenging, and be relevant.
- Key indicators of success are
achievement/proficiency scores, graduation
rates, dropout rates, percent of highly
qualified teachers, and adequacy and equity of
funding for all public schools.
- Improvement must be
continuous.
- Parental support and
involvement are critical to improved student
performance.
- Effective use of data is
critical to continuous improvement of teaching
and learning.
Comprehensive improvement plans
take several years to implement and to demonstrate
improvement in the targeted areas. An annual
revision provides the opportunity to identify
effective practices and/or actions that should be
continued and ineffective practices and/or actions
that should be revised or eliminated.
|